Cloud Parcel Model – Part 0: Introduction and Context (B)
π«️ How Cloud Parcel Models Simulate Height Without z(t) — And Why Precipitation Needs More Than One Parcel
Cloud parcel models are powerful tools in atmospheric science. They help us understand how supersaturation evolves, how droplets activate, and how latent heat feeds back into rising air. But there’s something subtle and important: most parcel models don’t explicitly simulate height (z) — and yet they simulate altitude-dependent processes quite well.
So how does this work? And how far can a single parcel model take us?
πΉ Vertical Motion: Implicit, Not Explicit
In the code you’re working with, the parcel’s vertical position z(t) is not integrated as a separate ODE. Instead, the model uses a fixed updraft speed w (e.g. 0.5 m/s), and time becomes a proxy for height:
So after 1800 seconds (30 minutes):
This is never explicitly solved in the script, but it underlies the system. All changes in temperature, supersaturation, and droplet radius evolve as if the parcel is rising through the atmosphere.
π‘ All changes in supersaturation (S), droplet radius (r), and temperature (T) over time are due to the parcel ascending into cooler, lower-pressure air and undergoing condensation and latent heating.
π Are All Particles Always Brought to Higher Altitudes?
Yes — in this type of 1-parcel model:
-
All initial aerosol particles are entrained in the parcel.
-
They are exposed to the same thermodynamic path.
-
Their growth depends only on their size/ΞΊ and the evolving supersaturation S(t).
The model assumes:
✔️ No gravitational settling,
✔️ No mixing or dispersion,
✔️ No vertical variability within the parcel.
So to answer the question:
"Are all of the bulk initial particles always brought up to higher distance?"
✅ Yes — all of them rise together with the parcel.
☁️ What Is a Parcel vs. a Cloud?
Let’s clarify terminology:
| Concept | Description |
|---|---|
| Parcel | A small, idealized volume of air that rises with its own identity. No internal gradients. No mixing. |
| Cloud | A large, turbulent system of many such parcels, with variability in motion, thermodynamics, and droplet properties. |
π§ͺ In your parcel model:
-
One rising parcel
-
One initial aerosol distribution
-
One vertical trajectory (z = w·t)
-
One temperature and vapor path
π©️ In a real cloud:
-
Many interacting parcels
-
Different updrafts
-
Variable humidity and aerosol content
-
Turbulence, entrainment, and mixing
-
Complex droplet and ice dynamics
❌ A cloud is not a single parcel
✅ A cloud is a volume composed of many parcels interacting over time and space
π§️ Is One Parcel Enough to Form Precipitation?
No — a single parcel can show droplet formation, but not precipitation.
Here’s why:
π§ 1. Warm Rain (Collision–Coalescence)
Droplets must collide and merge to form raindrops. But this requires:
-
Turbulent motion
-
Broad size spectrum
-
Asymmetric growth conditions
Single parcel models do not include turbulence or collisions.
❄️ 2. Ice Processes (Cold Rain / Snow)
Involve:
-
Ice nucleation
-
Riming
-
Aggregation
-
Bergeron–Findeisen processes
Again, these rely on spatial gradients and interaction across multiple parcels.
π¬ Models That Simulate Precipitation
| Model Type | Captures Precipitation? | Features |
|---|---|---|
| Parcel Model | ❌ No | Single trajectory, no mixing or collisions |
| Multi-parcel (Ensemble) | ⛅ Some | Statistical spread of parcels |
| Bulk Microphysics (1D/3D) | ✅ Yes | Mass budget in grid cells |
| Bin Microphysics (SBM) | ✅✅ Yes | Resolves size spectra, collisions |
| Large Eddy Simulation (LES) | ✅✅✅ Yes | 3D turbulence + microphysics |
| Cloud-Resolving Model (CRM) | ✅✅✅ Yes | Regional-scale cloud evolution |
π If You Want More Complexity...
To go beyond the limits of a basic parcel model:
| Feature | What It Adds |
|---|---|
| Multiple parcel layers | Simulate vertical stratification |
| Turbulent entrainment | Add mixing with ambient air |
| Differential activation | Track particles with different ΞΊ or sizes |
| Gravitational settling | Allow droplets to fall through parcel layers |
But, in a study that investigate black carbon (BC) heating effects on droplet activation, for example — the single-parcel framework is both physically consistent and insightful.
π Summary
| Question | Answer |
|---|---|
Does the model simulate z(t)? | Implicitly, via z = w·t |
| Are all particles lifted? | Yes — the whole aerosol population rises |
| Is one parcel a full cloud? | No — clouds consist of many interacting parcels |
| Can a parcel model form precipitation? | No — it lacks collisions, mixing, and variability |
| What models simulate rain? | LES, CRM, bin microphysics |
π§ Final Thoughts
Parcel models are like controlled experiments inside a rising balloon. They’re great for testing:
-
Activation theory
-
Droplet growth
-
Latent heat feedback
-
Supersaturation dynamics
But precipitation? That’s a story of collective behavior, requiring interaction, turbulence, and multidimensionality.
Understanding this distinction is the key to using parcel models wisely — and seeing their elegant simplicity as both a strength and a boundary.
Komentar
Posting Komentar